He starts by using various examples, both hypothetical and historical. These examples give the audience a list of moral choices.
He starts by using various examples, both hypothetical and historical. These examples give the audience a list of moral choices. He then guides these choices toward his point of view by attacking the strongest arguments against torture.
By starting with the example of a large scale terrorist attack on New York and slowly moving down to the kidnapping of a newborn baby, Levin attempts to make the reader see his argument on a wide variety of levels. Once he reaches the most personal level he then begins to argue the morality and constitutionality of the torture debate.
Through these methods Levin presents an argument that, at the very least, will put the seed of thought into the minds of his readers.
Levin begins his argument by stating his opinion, letting the reader immediately know what side he will be arguing. He uses the word "unwise" to describe the opinions of those who believe torture should not be used.
If he were to use the statement that, "I believe this attitude is incorrect",Punctuation missing or incorrect the phrase would not be as strong. It would leave the debate open to personal interpretation.
Punctuation incorrect He adds that there are situations where it is "morally mandatory" to use torture. Punctuation missing or incorrectWith these strong words he is setting the mood for his argument. After giving his opinion and setting the mood, Levin begins his series of questions.
He starts by presenting a scenario in which millions of people will die if a terrorist is not tortured into giving up information. He follows this question by implying that if we follow normal procedures millions of people will die.
He leaves the reader with no other choice than to agree with his view on the question. Now that he has the reader in agreement with him, Levin begins to focus the questions on smaller targets. He uses an example of a jumbo jet being hijacked to start simplifying his case.
He has now stair-stepped from millions of people down to ten, all in a couple of paragraphs. Levin seems to use a sales technique, where a salesperson asks leading questions that a customer will agree with. Once the reader has made up his mind on these questions Levin presents one more scenario.
This time he presents a case in which a newborn baby is kidnapped.Justin Haasbeek ENG Essay #8, In-class The Terrifying AIDS of Nature Stephen Jay Gould’s essay The Terrifying Normalcy of Aids presents the idea that technological advancement makes the human race superior to the forces of nature.
Today this premise is just as true as it was in when Gould published his essay. One of Gould’s main points in his essay is that the human race is a part %(1). AIDS is both a natural phenomenon and, potentially, the greatest natural tragedy in human history.
THE CARDBOARD MESSAGE of Epcot fosters the wrong attitudes; we must both reinsert ourselves into nature and view AIDS as a natural phenomenon in order to fight properly.
The Terrifying Normalcy of AID essaysIn Stephen Jay Gould essay the "The Terrifying Normalcy of AIDS" informs the reader about a deadly disease killing humankind. We the humans are at a time where we should not ignore AIDS. The Terrifying Normalcy of AID essaysIn Stephen Jay Gould essay the "The Terrifying Normalcy of AIDS" informs the reader about a deadly disease killing humankind.
We the humans are at a time where we should not ignore AIDS. AIDS is at threat to humans today. So far there is no cure to this. My article (“The Terrifying Normalcy of AIDS,” New York Times Magazine, April 19, ) is about the difference between evolutionary and personal time scales, not .
ACCORDING TO Rushton’s Race, Evolution, and Behavior fully modern Homo sapiens emerged in Africa , years ago. , years ago, a small group of Africans had a sudden urge to head north.
This small group inhabited the rest of the world, with minimal contact with the rest of the Africans who stayed in .